I was more than interested in the article regarding the keeping of chickens [“Residents call foul on more fowls,” June 8].
Some years ago, when this idea was first introduced, I made a presentation to City of Powell River council asking them not to pursue this idea because of the problems I could see that would arise. The keeping of chickens on a small city lot is just encouraging bears, raccoons and birds of prey to stop by. Even just chicken food will make them visit.
This issue would not be as bad if chickens were limited to lots of one acre or bigger.
Surely we have enough problems in town with wandering, hungry bears without adding an attractant such as chickens and chicken food. This venture will increase the workload of conservation and bylaw officers and the SPCA.
Many folk venturing into this do not know that chickens don't lay eggs for at least four months in the winter unless lights are kept on. Also, we have many small farmers in Powell River who are only too happy to sell their eggs.
Chickens live long after they stop laying. If they are to be slaughtered, where, when and by who? All issues need to be thought about.
We keep chickens as pets on an acreage and despite how many precautions we have taken, we are still fighting the battle with wildlife. Despite everything we've done: electric fences, flashing lights and holographic tape, we are still having critters killed.
I can't imagine having a coop as close to my house as described in the article. It would be unbearable in July unless it's cleaned on a very regular basis.
If I had known the three residents were making a presentation to the city I would have been there to support them. I earnestly hope the council will reconsider.
Audrey Hill
Highway 101
