Skip to content

Judicial oversight bill passes, creating new process for punishing judges

OTTAWA — A new process for how the Canadian Judicial Council will review misconduct allegations against judges has been written into the law.
20230623160632-649601d1625498955d321604jpeg
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada David Lametti arrives to a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, June 13, 2023. A new process for how the Canadian Judicial Council will review misconduct allegations against judges has been written into the law. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

OTTAWA — A new process for how the Canadian Judicial Council will review misconduct allegations against judges has been written into the law.

A bill that received royal assent Thursday evening amends the Judges Act to clarify when a judge can be removed and changes the way the council reports recommendations to remove a judge to the federal justice minister.

The law also creates a new panel to review complaints and determine whether a judge's removal is justified, as well as a new process for how judges can appeal disciplinary decisions against them. 

Justice Minister David Lametti says the new process will lead to timelier and more cost-effective resolutions, and replaces a more expensive, drawn-out process.

Anyone can make a complaint against a judge, but it must be done in writing and sent to the judicial council.

The judicial oversight process garnered heightened attention earlier this year when the council announced it would review a complaint against former Supreme Court justice Russell Brown, a probe that ended when Brown announced his retirement from the top court earlier this month.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 23, 2023. 

The Canadian Press